| 1 |
Mark Loeser <halcy0n <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Donnie Berkholz <spyderous <at> gentoo.org> said: |
| 5 |
> > Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > The patch now has the debugging output and x11-base/xorg-x11 check removed. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Excellent. Works perfectly. Since we're failing on them, perhaps we can |
| 9 |
> > say "obsolete" instead of "deprecated"? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Can we put this back to being a warning? It makes things a pain for arch |
| 12 |
> teams that are trying to mark a completely unrelated version of the package. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Thanks, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I will have to agree that this change has made it a pain to mark anything |
| 18 |
stable. I had 4 out of the 6 I did today bail out because of this. I took the |
| 19 |
simple easy fix and removed the check to stabalize the packages I needed to. I |
| 20 |
know we have people who want modular X yesterday, but causing trouble for dev's |
| 21 |
going about business that doesn't involve the modular problems directly is only |
| 22 |
going to cause resentment and frustration to all the teams involved. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives