| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:38:45 -0400 Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| As the QA lead, I am requesting that until the Council convenes and |
| 4 |
| decides on how we should proceed, that we not add anything else to |
| 5 |
| the tree for the sole reason of supporting another package manager's |
| 6 |
| features. This includes profiles or any other packages. This will |
| 7 |
| reduce headaches for all of us, and hopefully cut down on needless |
| 8 |
| arguments that get us no where. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Several arch teams have already stated their intention to go ahead with |
| 11 |
a Paludis profile, be it top level (ideal) or as a subprofile of their |
| 12 |
own individual profiles. Is there any technical reason that the QA lead |
| 13 |
wants to override the arch teams' wishes? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 17 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives