Archives
Archives
| From: | Tushar Teredesai <sukucorp@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:24:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 925fa7670607071318w3052844ch54a3ba94ea40cbf@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) by Ned Ludd |
||
| 1 | On 7/7/06, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > You want a pure 100% |
| 3 | > vanilla(POS) non working toolchain then go download it and |
| 4 | > compile it yourself. You will soon see why things exist the way |
| 5 | > they do.. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | LFS <http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs> has always been based on a |
| 8 | "vanilla" toolchain. Never ran into issues. Of course, we do apply |
| 9 | upstream patches when needed. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Tushar Teredesai |
| 13 | mailto:tushar@××××××××××××××××.org |
| 14 | http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |