| 1 |
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 07:40, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 2 |
> This wasn't quite what I had in mind when I asked how you wanted to |
| 3 |
> address an apparent problem with mozilla & garbage: |
| 4 |
> (I understand these are probably unrelated problems: mozilla+garbage |
| 5 |
& |
| 6 |
> mozilla-stable-ebuild removed, but I can't resist suggesting a |
| 7 |
> conspiracy...:-) .) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
note to self: learn to hit 'reply to all'! |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
As vapier stated, the ebuild was removed because it is old. It is the |
| 12 |
responsibility of each architecture maintainer to keep the mozilla |
| 13 |
versions up to date. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I have asked repeatedly that people do this, as I do not have IA64, |
| 16 |
SPARC, AMD64 or PowerPC systems available to me on which I can build and |
| 17 |
test Mozilla out. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The userbase can help their respective architectures out by stating that |
| 20 |
a specific version of Mozilla is serviceable on theirs, and ask to have |
| 21 |
it marked 'arch' on their particular CPU type. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Brad |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives