1 |
Jason Wever wrote: |
2 |
> However if |
3 |
> packages are broken by this unmasking, it *will* be masked on SPARC |
4 |
> until such a time that this is fixed. |
5 |
> |
6 |
<snip> |
7 |
> I'm not trying to be a party pooper here, but breaking the portage tree |
8 |
> should never be an acceptable answer. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Cheers, |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
To be clear here: nothing will be broken. Xorg 7.0 will just not |
14 |
provide virtual/x11 (and in fact blocks it), so there will be issues |
15 |
with blocks showing up due to the upgrade path. Avoiding the upgrade |
16 |
(and blockage) is very easy if necessary (eg, you use 200 unported |
17 |
packages or something). |
18 |
|
19 |
Joshua Baergen |
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |