Archives
Archives
| From: | Gert Menke <gert@××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo observations | ||
| Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2002 08:26:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20020310142233.GB2332@mouse.mydomain | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo observations by mrfab@arn.net | ||
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 07:43:29AM -0600, mrfab@×××.net wrote: |
| 4 | > I'd hesitate to go for root:www because there is always that possibility |
| 5 | > that php or mod_perl or just developer error in a script could allow a |
| 6 | > web user to overwrite a file--and with root permissions that could be a |
| 7 | > disaster. |
| 8 | Oh, I'm sorry. I was talking about the files when I said root:www. My httpd |
| 9 | runs as nobody:www. Or are you talking about files with the SUID bit set? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Greetings |
| 12 | Gert |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo observations | mrfab@×××.net |