Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New tool: merge-driver-ekeyword automatically resolves git merge conflicts involving KEYWORDS=...
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 21:35:49
Message-Id: CAEdQ38E=kXssSNFCxRXeudBqWgoSjy7Adf010JeW35KojbwFrA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New tool: merge-driver-ekeyword automatically resolves git merge conflicts involving KEYWORDS=... by Alessandro Barbieri
1 On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:36 PM Alessandro Barbieri
2 <lssndrbarbieri@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 > Il Mar 2 Mar 2021, 20:03 Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> ha scritto:
5 >>
6 >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:11 AM Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote:
7 >> > why don't we just enforce putting each
8 >> > keyword on a separate line instead, so that we don't have this problem
9 >> > in the first place?
10 >>
11 >> Why don't we change 30 thousand ebuilds rather than use this script?
12 >
13 >
14 > IMO before this the keyword mechanism should be reworked to be three-state:
15 > 1 Arch known working
16 > 2 Arch known not working
17 > 3 Arch untested/status unknown
18 >
19 > And let the user choose to use packages from 3 or not
20
21 Are you actually replying to me? I was restating mjo's question to
22 demonstrate the absurdity, not suggesting a different course of
23 action.