1 |
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:12:52 +0300 |
2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti: |
5 |
> > On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: |
6 |
> >> Hi there! |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to |
9 |
> >> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. This will no longer bother the user with |
10 |
> >> updating these files. Thus it will reduce the number of bugs |
11 |
> >> triggered by forgotten config-file updates. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> If user needs home-brewn rules he is requested to add own files, |
14 |
> >> and not use the already existing ones. |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Only problem I see: What to do with people having custom |
18 |
> > modifications inside the default rules-files? |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Matthias |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Can they add /etc/udev/rules.d back to CONFIG_PROTECT in make.conf? |
25 |
|
26 |
No, that wouldn't work. However they could add '-/etc/udev/rules.d' to |
27 |
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK or add individual files to CONFIG_PROTECT. |
28 |
|
29 |
Marius |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |