| 1 |
On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it |
| 3 |
> talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore. |
| 4 |
> basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the |
| 5 |
> Council. so rather than confuse people (since we explicitly quiz people on |
| 6 |
> this), how about this update: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> --- glep-0001.txt 5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000 1.12 |
| 9 |
> +++ glep-0001.txt 9 Mar 2011 22:18:07 -0000 |
| 10 |
> @@ -98,21 +98,20 @@ the form of code, patch, or URL to same |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> GLEP authors are responsible for collecting community feedback on a GLEP |
| 13 |
> before submitting it for review. A GLEP that has not been discussed on |
| 14 |
> -gentoo-dev@g.o and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be |
| 15 |
> +gentoo-dev@g.o and the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be |
| 16 |
> accepted. However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on public |
| 17 |
> mailing lists should be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions efficient |
| 18 |
> include setting up a specific forums thread for the topic, having the GLEP |
| 19 |
> author accept private comments in the early design phases, etc. GLEP authors |
| 20 |
> should use their discretion here. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requirement |
| 24 |
could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
Petteri |
Archives