Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri R├Ąty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] updating GLEP 1
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:44:57
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] updating GLEP 1 by Mike Frysinger
On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it > talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore. > basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the > Council. so rather than confuse people (since we explicitly quiz people on > this), how about this update: > > --- glep-0001.txt 5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000 1.12 > +++ glep-0001.txt 9 Mar 2011 22:18:07 -0000 > @@ -98,21 +98,20 @@ the form of code, patch, or URL to same > > GLEP authors are responsible for collecting community feedback on a GLEP > before submitting it for review. A GLEP that has not been discussed on > -gentoo-dev@g.o and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be > +gentoo-dev@g.o and the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be > accepted. However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on public > mailing lists should be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions efficient > include setting up a specific forums thread for the topic, having the GLEP > author accept private comments in the early design phases, etc. GLEP authors > should use their discretion here. >
Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requirement could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion. Regards, Petteri


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] updating GLEP 1 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] updating GLEP 1 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>