| 1 |
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:32:06 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen |
| 2 |
<brix@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 4 |
| > Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make |
| 5 |
| > install" is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's |
| 6 |
| > not good. A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if |
| 7 |
| > "install" is in its commandline, in which case it can automatically |
| 8 |
| > add a -j1 to be safe. |
| 9 |
| |
| 10 |
| What is the problem with using -jX for `make install`? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Anything using a standardish autotools install can potentially explode |
| 13 |
when parallelised. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives