| 1 |
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 16:05, Phil Brault wrote: |
| 2 |
> I may plan on rebuilding my system here in a few and I was wondering if |
| 3 |
> it would be wise to build the entire system using the |
| 4 |
> ACCPET_KEYWORDS="~x86" setting seeing as how that part of the portage |
| 5 |
> tree contains more concurrent software. However my main concern is |
| 6 |
> stability and it being worth it as it takes around 6 hours to build my |
| 7 |
> system. If anyone wants a sample of my make.conf I can share on request. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I would say that is a bad idea. While a good number of the ~x86 ebuilds |
| 10 |
are revision bumps that have not been sufficiently tested, you will find |
| 11 |
some that won't compile (although it is my opinion that those should be |
| 12 |
in package.mask), and it would make the installation a real headache if |
| 13 |
you have to worry about emerge failing every couple of packages. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I recommend just using x86 packages, and then manually upgrading to ~x86 |
| 16 |
packages if you need it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Chad Huneycutt |
| 20 |
chadh@g.o |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives