Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:38:37
Message-Id: 53D8A0E6.8000000@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps by Samuli Suominen
1 On 7/30/14, 7:36 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
2 > If it's 2-3 packages out of ~300, I'd rather pick them out than
3 > revision bump all ~300 for the 2-3. Or not pick them out at all
4 > and let users do the rebuild (which is the obvious answer
5 > to the output you posted)
6
7 Peter Stuge pointed it out already, but I also wanted to say rebuilding
8 the affected packages is not obvious to me either.
9
10 Paweł
11
12 >>
13 >> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
14 >> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
15 >>
16 >> virtual/udev:0
17 >>
18 >> (virtual/udev-208-r2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
19 >> >=virtual/udev-171:0/0=[gudev] required by (media-video/cheese-3.12.2::gentoo, installed)
20 >> virtual/udev:0/0=[gudev] required by (x11-misc/colord-1.2.1::gentoo, installed)
21 >>
22 >> (virtual/udev-215::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
23 >> =virtual/udev-215 required by (games-util/xboxdrv-0.8.5-r1::gentoo, installed)
24 >> (and 22 more with the same problem)
25 >>
26 >
27 >
28 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>