| 1 |
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 00:17:27 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> i'm not saying `emake` covers all solutions you proposed, just that |
| 5 |
> the base usage isnt nearly as bleak. there are some cases where |
| 6 |
> having a wrapper around emake would be useful (such as compiling |
| 7 |
> multiple files or linking things in). so if you wanted to slap |
| 8 |
> something together, we can look at it further. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well, I've already covered one corner case myself, which is the zpaq |
| 11 |
ebuild. I would approve a comment on my idea here: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/changeset/10641/sunrise/app-arch/zpaq/zpaq-1.10.ebuild |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The hard part was that zpaq.cpp had to be compiled to both the execu- |
| 16 |
table and the stub object file (with additional -DOPT flag). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I've decided that the simplest and most fail-proof idea was to create |
| 19 |
an additional source file, defining 'OPT' and including the real code, |
| 20 |
and compiling all of that within a single 'emake' call. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
<http://mgorny.alt.pl> |
| 27 |
<xmpp:mgorny@××××××.ru> |
Archives