1 |
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I'm just wondering if we're jumping the gun a little bit on |
3 |
> IUSE="gui".. yes it'll be nice to have one flag that "just works" |
4 |
> for anyone not caring about the details, but it'll also mean |
5 |
> propagating a slew of REQUIRED_USE=" {X,wayland,gtk,qt4,qt5}? ( gui |
6 |
> )" entries and a lot of extra use-defaults which may or may not |
7 |
> cleanup the sub-profiles of desktop/ .... |
8 |
|
9 |
A completely valid concern. Of course, there is no requirement that |
10 |
all this stuff happen overnight. |
11 |
|
12 |
> Also, I believe we need to have the conversation about the pros and |
13 |
> cons of IUSE=gui here before the council meeting, yes? |
14 |
|
15 |
You can read my original post to -project: |
16 |
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/4776 |
17 |
|
18 |
I did start it out with my reservation that this probably wouldn't |
19 |
come to a vote. However, I did want to at least toss out a specific |
20 |
proposal so that we have something to throw darts at, vs just going |
21 |
around the room saying "sounds like something that might need some |
22 |
attention." |
23 |
|
24 |
This is of course an opportunity to have that conversation, but I |
25 |
recognize that we're starting pretty late considering the timing of |
26 |
the meeting. I didn't really intend to actually push for a vote on |
27 |
this. |
28 |
|
29 |
Most likely we'll express thoughts both pro and con, and then take it |
30 |
back to the lists and maybe try to finalize something next month. |
31 |
|
32 |
My sense is that this has been going on for a long time though and |
33 |
we're seeing problems over and over. I agree that wayland is still a |
34 |
bit off in the future, but I can see it coming up again there. In the |
35 |
meantime both qt and gtk have run into this. I don't want to do |
36 |
something just to do something, but it seems like my proposal is along |
37 |
the lines of what most have been talking about. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Rich |