Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Annoying X.Org tarball naming (and how to deal with it)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:26:30
Message-Id: 43AAC50B.5050003@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Annoying X.Org tarball naming (and how to deal with it) by Ferris McCormick
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ferris McCormick wrote:
5 | On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 21:34 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
6 | What does this mean for the future? All modular X ebuilds that are part
7 | of a full release will require XORG_PV to be set. All modular X ebuilds
8 | that aren't part of a full release will not require anything new. I'm
9 | doing it this way because I expect there to be more packages that aren't
10 | part of a full release than ones that are.
11 |
12 | Please give me your input on this.
13 |
14 |
15 |> Seems fine to me. I hope you are right in your assumption about
16 |> packages in full releases.
17
18 Even if I'm wrong, it's a matter of setting a single variable, and it
19 will always have to be set for all non-7.0 releases either way (assuming
20 ~ I'd default to 7.0) so they know which release they're part of.
21
22 Thanks,
23 Donnie
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
26
27 iD8DBQFDqsULXVaO67S1rtsRAo67AKCJ3f5HARANAoYdmKmD50aBMRZowgCeLggq
28 6Bab1dfkAH7OhpxleZiYZIQ=
29 =88ec
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list