Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Cc: | java <java@g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Java7 stabilization |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:24:03 |
| Message-Id: | 1415618623.1034.7.camel@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Hello |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I would like to see if we could finally try to stabilize java7 on Gentoo |
| 4 | as some external tools start to require it. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | There is currently this tracker opened: |
| 7 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384609 |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I am unsure why: |
| 10 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483018 |
| 11 | |
| 12 | should block the stabilization as we can have multiple java versions |
| 13 | installed due slots |
| 14 | |
| 15 | The tracker list two broken packages that would need either patching or |
| 16 | to be forced to use older slots and this one: |
| 17 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515830 |
| 18 | |
| 19 | That looks more important. Then, I also wonder about what |
| 20 | implementations are we meant to look for this stabilization. Should we |
| 21 | look for bugs affecting icedtea-bin and also oracle's implementation? (I |
| 22 | was wondering if the tracker was really collecting all the issues :/) |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Thanks |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Java7 stabilization | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |