1 |
May I suggest first moving everything into /usr one at a time, and for each |
2 |
file moved out of /bin or /sbin or whatever, replace it with a symlink? |
3 |
|
4 |
This will allow the /bin and /sbin directories themselves to atomically be |
5 |
replaced with symlinks later. |
6 |
|
7 |
Doing it all at once will leave a gap. |
8 |
|
9 |
For each file: |
10 |
|
11 |
1. Install it in the new location |
12 |
2. Delete the old file and replace it with a symlink |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
16 |
|
17 |
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:22:16 PM CEST, Rich Freeman wrote: |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> Again, I don't see this as a reason not to make it optional, but I |
20 |
>> suspect that we will find bugs here from time to time which users who |
21 |
>> run with the split /usr will have to report/fix. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Considering the advantages of usr-merge are rather specific IMHO but risks |
26 |
> during the migration are high, I think you're optimistic on the user base |
27 |
> of usr-merged systems :) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Heck, it hasn't happened yet because there hasn't been such a big need for |
30 |
> it. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |