| 1 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:04 -0800 |
| 3 |
> Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Is GuideXML in fact a barrier for submission (do we get complaints |
| 6 |
>> about it?) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I seem to remember doc/newsletter people stating on multiple occasions |
| 9 |
> that they're happy to accept plain text submissions (feel free to beat |
| 10 |
> me if i hallucinated it). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
docs team != GMN*, but yes, we're happy to take submissions in plain |
| 14 |
text form. However, it does take longer to GuideXMLify an article when |
| 15 |
readying the newsletter than if we get one already in XML; then it's |
| 16 |
just drop-in. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
* (puts on GDP hat) Actually, we don't mind getting plain text docs, |
| 20 |
either, since we too can GuideXMLify those submissions. |
Archives