| 1 |
On Saturday 19 November 2005 20:09, Thierry Carrez wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Now, we might we perhaps move the focus to more important issues jstubbs |
| 4 |
> > mentioned in his last email, expecting that any implementation of the now |
| 5 |
> > approved GLEP wrt the email addresses won't be pushed in a similar way |
| 6 |
> > the whole revised GLEP has been, until infra issues and usefulness of |
| 7 |
> > this are sorted out/reconsidered at least. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> 75% of his email is about things that were in the original GLEP. Why |
| 10 |
> didn't he raise his voice at that time ? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As Ciaran said in the other thread, I was waiting for (at least) the next |
| 13 |
round. I saw very little agreement in the original thread so didn't give it |
| 14 |
the time for a viewing; just as in the `emerge --news` thread. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I honestly don't see why you're defending the council's hasty decision when |
| 17 |
the council members all knew that the timing was bad while the decision was |
| 18 |
being hasted. The statement that it wouldn't happen again is evidence of |
| 19 |
that. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives