1 |
* Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
<snip> |
4 |
|
5 |
> Just to add... 30 days is the usual package mask. As AW states, |
6 |
> the idea of the mask is so users will have time after masking to |
7 |
> save the masked ebuild to their overlay and/or file a bug saying |
8 |
|
9 |
but then it may be too late. |
10 |
I just did a test, moved by package.mask away and called |
11 |
emerge --pretend --update world . |
12 |
It would downgrade lots of packages, ie. bugzilla to an older version |
13 |
not yet supporting postgresql and so immediately make many services |
14 |
(ie. all my bugzilla installations) unusable. |
15 |
|
16 |
Re-masking must be handled very carefully. At least portage has to |
17 |
know how some package was masked at installation time and shout out |
18 |
an big-fat warning, if an mask was added later. |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
cu |
22 |
-- |
23 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
24 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
25 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
26 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
27 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
28 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
29 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
30 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |