Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Masking practics
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:07:12
Message-Id: 20060803160326.GC19696@nibiru.local
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: last ritest for dev-java/saxon-bin by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 * Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> schrieb:
2
3 <snip>
4
5 > Just to add... 30 days is the usual package mask. As AW states,
6 > the idea of the mask is so users will have time after masking to
7 > save the masked ebuild to their overlay and/or file a bug saying
8
9 but then it may be too late.
10 I just did a test, moved by package.mask away and called
11 emerge --pretend --update world .
12 It would downgrade lots of packages, ie. bugzilla to an older version
13 not yet supporting postgresql and so immediately make many services
14 (ie. all my bugzilla installations) unusable.
15
16 Re-masking must be handled very carefully. At least portage has to
17 know how some package was masked at installation time and shout out
18 an big-fat warning, if an mask was added later.
19
20
21 cu
22 --
23 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
25 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
26 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
27 http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
28 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
29 http://patches.metux.de/
30 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking practics Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>