| 1 |
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió: |
| 2 |
> Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : |
| 3 |
> > El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 4 |
> > > Hello |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for |
| 7 |
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491 |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Thanks |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > This is an updated news item for trying to cover Ciaran and Matthew |
| 13 |
> > suggestions: |
| 14 |
> > 1. It doesn't ask people to use USE="*" |
| 15 |
> > 2. Before sending this, I would add all cameras to base/make.defaults as |
| 16 |
> > already done for similar cases (like alsa, lcd devices and others) |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Do you agree with this? |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Thanks :-) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> no, adding all cameras is most likely a waste of time for maintainers, |
| 23 |
> it is prone to errors when cameras get added/removed which is already |
| 24 |
> complicated enough to maintain. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
What kind of errors will people see? As I have just tested, if I run: |
| 28 |
CAMERAS="bbhsgdd" emerge -pv media-libs/libgphoto2 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I get no error (that would be equivalent to a camera that got removed on |
| 31 |
a bump). |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
In the case of a CAMERA addition, we would see it when bumping (as one |
| 34 |
of them wouldn't be enabled automatically). It doesn't look to |
| 35 |
complicate to maintain for me then :-/ |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> If someone really wants a non-null default, I suggest enabling the ptp2 |
| 38 |
> camera driver (PTP support) which is available for most cameras out |
| 39 |
> there. |
| 40 |
> |
Archives