Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-7 emerge blocks
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:47:38
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.64.0510242326330.10291@terciopelo.krait.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-7 emerge blocks by Dan Armak
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Dan Armak wrote:
5
6 > On Monday 24 October 2005 19:24, Ferris McCormick wrote:
7 >> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:48 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
8 >>> Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
9 >>> forums, or irc. This list is for discussion of Gentoo development.
10 >>
11 >> Actually, this is a discussion of X-modular, and up to now, all
12 >> X-modular posts have come here (it is very much a -dev issue; the
13 >> X-modular suite is masked, unless something has changed quite recently.)
14 >
15 > It was a matter of misunderstanding emerge output (block by <xorg-x11-7, and
16 > the OP apparently missed the <). Thus nothing to do with the modular X. It
17 > was also crossposted to gentoo-user. IMHO mostly any question about using
18 > portage correctly, which is suitable to gentoo-user, is not suitable to
19 > gentoo-dev.
20 >
21 Well, maybe so. However that missing '<' is kind of important, and when
22 playing with X-modular, the portage output really looks like the modular
23 packages are blocking the non-existent xorg-x11-7. It's not a "matter of
24 using portage correctly" because portage is misreporting the (phantom)
25 problem.
26
27 As I recall, it looks like this (for example):
28 x11-base/xorg-server-xxx [B x11-base/xorg-x11-7]
29 which without that little '<' is, shall we say, wrong. Since (so far as I
30 know) it arises only in the X-modular context, this is the right place for
31 the question. (With '<' it's true but irrelevant, but portage is being
32 misled into believing xorg-x11 is required. R. Hill addressed that issue in
33 another post.)
34
35 Or maybe it arises elsewhere too?
36
37 > Maybe I was too harsh in the tone of my reply. If so I
38 apologize.
39 >> --
40 > Dan Armak
41 > Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
42 > Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
43 > Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
44 >
45
46 Regards,
47 Ferris
48
49 - --
50 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
51 Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc, devrel)
52 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
53 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
54
55 iD8DBQFDXXIjQa6M3+I///cRAlXxAJ9wGluXrvSQ9KOQkKhSAwpOVPMENwCfXVRi
56 KjILUCOMih2TH0IG1YQdM8k=
57 =11KQ
58 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
59 --
60 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-7 emerge blocks Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>