[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: repoman - I cannot handle it...

[Steve Long]

Marius Mauch wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:13:58 +0100
> Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
>> Well the line from portage_versions.py is:
>> ver_regexp = re.compile("^(cvs\\.)?(\\d+)((\\.\\d+)*)([a-z]?)((_(pre|
>> p|beta
>> alpha|rc)\\d*)*)(-r(\\d+))?$")
>> - which means that a version begins with either a digit or cvs
>> followed by digit.
>
> Not precisely: a digit, or "cvs" followed by a dot and a digit (you got
> it right in the following, but not in the code posted earlier)
>
Bleh, thanks: code review FTW! Sleep-loss er FTL :p
 
>> We represented this in bash (for verCompare) as:
>> ver='^(cvs\.)?([0-9]+)((\.[0-9]+)*)([a-z]?)((_(pre|p|beta|alpha|rc)
>> [0-9]*)* (-r([0-9]+))?$'
>>
>> I think we can use:
>> CPV='^(.*-.*)/(.*)-(cvs\.)?([0-9]+)((\.[0-9]+)*)([a-z]?)((_(pre|p|beta
>> alpha|rc)[0-9]*)*)(-r([0-9.]+))?$'
>
> Well, categories don't necessarily have to contain a dash (though all
> official ones do currently).
>
Ah OK, excellent!
^(([[:alpha:]]+-[[:alpha:]]+)|virtual)/.. and
^([[:alpha:]]+(-[[:alpha:]]+)?)/.. (if other single-terms are to be allowed)
- would add one to every subsequent term index (for the general case, not
when globbing the tree.)

If we can correctly reduce this to a single regex match, it'll make my life
a lot easier :)

(For update there's no need to check the category exists, since the strings
are taken from portage output, but such a check could be performed after
the match.)


-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list