Archives
Archives
| From: | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support | ||
| Date: | Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:11:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200512270308.00829.carlo@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 27 December 2005 02:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > Nooo! That's exactly the point I was making. Carsten is assuming that |
| 3 | > by using [slot:bar] syntax, no backwards incompatibility will be |
| 4 | > introduced by adding a new [fish:] key. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Nooo! ;) I said it would look more consistent, than always adding a new way |
| 7 | (§$%&€<> or so) to describe or latest enhanced dependency atom. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Carsten |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support | Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |