Archives
Archives
| From: | Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt: ChangeLog qt-4.3.2.ebuild | ||
| Date: | Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:55:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1191483815.2542.11.camel@uberpc.marples.name | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt: ChangeLog qt-4.3.2.ebuild by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 00:32 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 | > Sure. If there's no requirement to stick to portable sh, why shouldn't |
| 3 | > we use whatever features of bash we like? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | You can use whatever bash specific features you like. |
| 6 | Just don't expect them to behave entirely the same way across versions. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | What do you gain from using a bashism there anyway? Is it that it looks |
| 9 | nice? Or is it something else? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Thanks |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Roy |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |