| 1 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
| 3 |
>> An advantage to this approach is that package moves just become aliases |
| 4 |
>> - existing stuff doesn't break yet you get the new categorisation as |
| 5 |
>> well. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's actually a disadvantage. The whole point of moving a package is |
| 8 |
> to take it *out* of its existing category. Just adding an alias into a |
| 9 |
> second category makes the tree more of a mess - not less. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+1 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I really dislike this idea of aliasing ebuild categories, yuck... Way |
| 14 |
better to fix what needs to be fixed to make package moves as smooth and |
| 15 |
seamless as possible. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
jakub |
Archives