Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:01:35
Message-Id: 4FC4E3F3.5010601@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? by Rich Freeman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 05/29/2012 04:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
5 > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 >>
8 >> Wouldn't that break users who sync using a regular user? And then
9 >> break again, and again every time portage is merged?
10 >
11 > Yup, unless that regular user is the same one used for userpriv
12 > (if I'm correctly understanding the problem that you're pointing
13 > at). I don't see this as a show-stopper - just a reason to have a
14 > news item. Those not using userpriv can always disable it and run
15 > as root as they are already doing. Those who are using a regular
16 > user to sync could ensure that their make.conf uses the same user
17 > for userpriv.
18 >
19 > Rich
20 >
21
22 - -1
23
24 I am against too many defaults. It's documented and people can
25 activate it.
26 I'm already annoyed by pre-set stuff like "cups" in
27 releases/make.defaults.
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
30 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
31
32 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPxOPzAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz9d8H/A0AQr57nDv/0n0+jN8bxdxc
33 nPQyBN9faSuh8IYztQmFe1Xpn/JFx9LoqRGQrvncMmzjmPkM1iaoXUpuo/qw5Fys
34 ar9pN84yZoAJuzgMdLzLs0U/6lqkvLzO+x1Y5DkNU2F+h3Bx9sAk+4vCUjEYg/pC
35 UdXkeRONaB62p/D2T2ucP6IuG6qBI/raW7vvDvkiDGzVbNnDBe4hGESh3Fb4Gd/Y
36 x/P/QJ+cZvFF3SvqhORMeXlgccbqU2kBy2Bwcq2GwKKmYIdKwnA2J0KKwqLkHraD
37 8pkTzUsvqxnQVqFGfCvFyJe3uwiJKQoTIAGugf3n9irvczuZTQ9MDWoZkGKiaNI=
38 =eo74
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies