| 1 |
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 10:34 pm, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> If however you wanted to fix all the broken code you could use something |
| 3 |
> like the upcoming mudflap which would incur a much larger performance |
| 4 |
> hit, so much in fact that it can't even be considered for production |
| 5 |
> use. When it hits our tree I'll sacrifice one of machines on my lan for |
| 6 |
> the sole sake of trying to catch bugs and fixing them at the source |
| 7 |
> level. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
for those of you who (like me) have nfc what mudflap is, ive found a nice pdf |
| 10 |
which covers it all which ive mirrored here: |
| 11 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/mudflap.pdf |
| 12 |
-mike |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives