Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:31:51
Message-Id: 1110749501.1903.23.camel@pursuit
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot
3 > <griffon26@g.o> wrote:
4 > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if
5 > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard
6 > | masked) than the thing depending on it.
7 >
8 > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I know
9 > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed...
10
11 What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman
12 doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look at
13 daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think
14 someone mentioned something like that once.
15
16 --
17 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
18 Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
19
20 ---
21 GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
22 Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
23
24 ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>