| 1 |
On Sat, 2020-06-20 at 13:29 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2020-06-20 12:07, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Al least, python2 is not on your list. |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > Be first into the future by masking this stuff and |
| 6 |
> > > Last out of the past by leaving up to users to decide. |
| 7 |
> > > It could stay in the tree, masked, as long as python2. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Do you really think it'd be better to last rite a 1000 packages |
| 11 |
> > simultaneously? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> What's the purpose of this at all? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> dev-lang/python:2.7 won't go away that soon. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Removing perfectly working and up-to-date software which is in |
| 18 |
> maintenance-only mode like net-mail/offlineimap is just not user-friendly. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It doesn't even has deps on other Python packages blocking your cleanup |
| 21 |
> delusion. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Don't you think that accussing others publicly of being delusional is |
| 25 |
not appropriate? Just because someone doesn't agree with your vision is |
| 26 |
no reason to insult your fellow developers. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives