Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bryan D. Stine" <admin@××××××××.net>
To: "Hallgrimur H. Gunnarsson" <hhg@××××.is>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flag 'daemontools' as an alternative to init.d
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:24:42
Message-Id: 3F5E532F.2080204@kentonet.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flag 'daemontools' as an alternative to init.d by "Hallgrimur H. Gunnarsson"
1 Personally, when using qmail and djbdns, I found daemontools to be a bit
2 of an annoyance. But, as you said, it's purely a matter of taste. I'm
3 all about the availability of choice when benefits can result.
4
5 I'll leave it up to real Gentoo devs as to whether or not a USE flag
6 would be the best choice (can't think of anything better off the top of
7 my head), but it certainly seems worth a looksee.
8
9 Hallgrimur H. Gunnarsson wrote:
10
11 >Sorry, I forgot to answer the real question :-). There is definitely
12 >a positive impact.
13 >
14 >Daemontools is just an alternative to init.d, it has some advantages
15 >over it in my opinion, such as portability, more flexibility with
16 >signals, logging and more. You can read up on some of the advantages
17 >in the http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/faq.html.
18 >
19 >Of course, this is a matter of taste. But daemontools is already being
20 >used to supervise some services, such as qmail and djbdns. And since
21 >it's already in use, I think it'd be the right thing to do to implement
22 >some generic mechanism in which services can offer you to use
23 >daemontools to supervise them, i.e. the USE flag.
24 >
25 >-- hhg
26 >
27 >On 09.09.2003 "Hallgrimur H. Gunnarsson" <hhg@××××.is> wrote:
28 >
29 >
30 >>On 09.09.2003 "Bryan D. Stine" <admin@××××××××.net> wrote:
31 >>
32 >>
33 >>>But doesn't daemontools itself use an initscript anyway? I suppose you
34 >>>just want this to be used in a way similar to how it works with qmail
35 >>>and djbdns? It's an interesting idea, but (excuse my ignorance on this)
36 >>>I don't really see what positive impact it will have on the system. Feel
37 >>>free to insult and enlighten me!
38 >>>
39 >>>
40 >>Daemontools has to be run from somewhere yes, just as init.d is
41 >>run through inittab.
42 >>
43 >>Daemontools is currently being executed through an init.d script,
44 >>which is not the preferred way to do it. Usually you run it from
45 >>inittab.
46 >>
47 >>-- hhg
48 >>
49 >>--
50 >>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
51 >>
52 >>
53 >>
54 >
55 >
56 >
57 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flag 'daemontools' as an alternative to init.d Juan Jesus Prieto <jjptapia@×××××××.com>