| 1 |
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:26:01 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > You could just have gtk2 and gtk3 use flags in the ebuild, use |
| 4 |
> > REQUIRED_USE to ensure that at least one is enabled, and build |
| 5 |
> > things twice in the ebuild if necessary. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Ah, so because a few paludis users may be building an additional |
| 8 |
> variant of webkit-gtk unnecessarily, we should force all Gentoo users |
| 9 |
> to randomly rebuild 1-2 variants depending on how soon they're going |
| 10 |
> to get the USE correctly. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
No. Because the ebuilds would be abusing functionality in a fairly |
| 13 |
horrible way, we should avoid doing that until we have a good solution |
| 14 |
in place. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Or, looking at it another way, Portage's upgrade rules shouldn't be |
| 17 |
locked in place because of weird behaviour from a few packages. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives