| 1 |
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:10:13 +0100 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> another option would be to (try to) revive glibc-2.5, 2.12, and 2.17 instead. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Yes I know they are even older, but these are the versions that RHEL uses, and |
| 7 |
> for which RH still provides support (until 2020 for 2.5, 2024 for 2.12)... |
| 8 |
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release#Distribution_Branch_Mapping |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That however would require that the RHEL patchsets are public somehwere. Which |
| 11 |
> I doubt... after all there's an "E" in RHEL... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You maybe won't get the full details of the changes but all the patches |
| 14 |
are here. This looks like a much better breakdown than you get with |
| 15 |
their kernel patches. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!glibc.git |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives