Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:06:04
Message-Id: 1133406210.8626.0.camel@Darkmere.darkmere
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;) by "Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)"
1 On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 02:29 +0100, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
2 > Hello,
3 > I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the
4 > possible performance boost they could give.
5 >
6 > The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the
7 > running system than prelink is, on the other hand, it does require a
8 > more intrusive surgery into the core systems.
9 >
10 > So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it
11 > be worth the time spent on this?
12 > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html
13 >
14
15 For the interested :
16
17 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114008
18
19
20
21 --
22 begin .signature
23 Tortured users / Laughing in pain
24 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
25 end

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature