| 1 |
hasufell schrieb: |
| 2 |
>>>> Followup question, which of these is less dumb? |
| 3 |
>>>> |
| 4 |
>>>> Option 1: berkdb? ( >=sys-libs/db-4:* <sys-libs/db-6:* ) |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> This doesn't mean what you think it means. A user who has db-3 and db-7 |
| 7 |
>>> installed satisfies that dependency. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Indeed, thanks. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That's an interesting pitfall. I am pretty sure we have this kind of |
| 14 |
> syntax a lot in the tree. Might make sense to document it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It's ok and works as expected as long as you depend on only one slot. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives