Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-4 in ebuilds? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:15:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130202111305.5d415bbf@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] bash-4 in ebuilds? by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:06:39 +0100 |
| 2 | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > From a little discussion in this bug |
| 4 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11 |
| 5 | > it seems that it's not entirely sure what bash version can be assumed. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > PMS says, that I have to assume 3.2 or later |
| 8 | > https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-620006 |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > But there is no stable bash version from 3.2 to 4.1 |
| 11 | > portage itself depends on >=app-shells/bash-4.2_p37 |
| 12 | |
| 13 | It's irrelevant what Portage depends upon, since this is about the |
| 14 | upgrade path. PMS specifies what the Council voted upon last time this |
| 15 | came up. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-4 in ebuilds? | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |