| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 14:47 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 09:13 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Just because the maintaining *project* doesn't |
| 5 |
> > want it doesn't mean it doesn't belong to that herd. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This is incorrect and you should not encourage people to add pkgs to |
| 8 |
> a herd unless they get permission from that herd. If a herd does not |
| 9 |
> want it you shall not shit in their home (it's rude). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
A herd doesn't *want* anything. It is a group of packages. Perhaps you |
| 12 |
mean a maintaining project? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> When a package lists a herd then the responsibility is shared |
| 15 |
> among the maintainer and the herd. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Only if someone didn't list themselves as the maintainer, which would be |
| 18 |
wrong. Just because the games team doesn't maintain something doesn't |
| 19 |
mean it isn't a game anymore. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 24 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 25 |
Games - Developer |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives