| 1 |
Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
>>Symlink? If MIT == MetaKit, then: |
| 3 |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| 4 |
>>ln -s MIT MetaKit |
| 5 |
> I don't know about this specific case but generally speaking licenses |
| 6 |
> that're similar in language and intent have very small (often cosmetic) |
| 7 |
> differences; if there is even the slightest difference it (legally) |
| 8 |
> qualifies as a different license and probably really should be included |
| 9 |
> separately to be safe |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Exactly my point :) I've looked at MIT and MetaKit and: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+Copyright (c) 1996-2001 Jean-Claude Wippler |
| 14 |
-Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Except formatting and above diff theye are identical. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik RLU #322999 GPG:0xBC555551 |
| 20 |
gentoo - kernel 2.6.11-ck10 |
| 21 |
http://fatcat.ftj.agh.edu.pl/~nelchael/ |
| 22 |
.... now touch these wires to your tongue! |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives