1 |
Paul de Vrieze posted <200409271101.42703.pauldv@g.o>, excerpted |
2 |
below, on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:01:42 +0200: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Monday 27 September 2004 05:52, Duncan wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Evidently .51 is rather stricter in some things than .50 and a number |
7 |
>> of things are QA Notices now that were silent, before. Are things to |
8 |
>> the point where it's worthwhile bugging the various ebuilds that emit |
9 |
>> these notices, illegal eclass inheritance and the like, or are there |
10 |
>> still enough of them it'd just be unnecessary noise? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If you could come up with patches for those ebuilds (or eclasses) then |
13 |
> please post them to bugzilla. (We get the notices too) Without patches it |
14 |
> is probably more of an annoyance than actually useful (most maintainers |
15 |
> know about them). |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks. I figured something of that nature. My ability in that area is |
18 |
somewhat limited and I haven't looked to see if it's within my range, yet, |
19 |
so I'll avoid filing on them now. I had just seen enough of them to goad |
20 |
me into asking, lest I be guilty of not giving back where I could, since |
21 |
one thing I /can/ do is file bugs! <g> |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
25 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little |
26 |
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- |
27 |
Benjamin Franklin |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |