1 |
2009-08-12 20:41:30 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): |
2 |
> Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): |
3 |
> > I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2 |
4 |
> > compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2" |
5 |
> > and bumping up the required portage version. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that |
8 |
> > they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since, |
9 |
> > the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new |
10 |
> > directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new |
11 |
> > profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are |
12 |
> > produced. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user |
15 |
> > can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list. |
18 |
> > Timeframe: 1 week from now. |
19 |
> > -Jeremy |
20 |
> Agreed. This is great idea. |
21 |
> Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already handles |
22 |
> it right). |
23 |
> package.mask/koffice-2 |
24 |
> package.mask/live-gnome |
25 |
> .... |
26 |
|
27 |
+1. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |