| 1 |
Ferris McCormick posted |
| 2 |
<1137006259.24481.28.camel@××××××××××××××××××.com>, excerpted below, on |
| 3 |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:04:19 +0000: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> B. "Jurisdiction" --- why this is something for devrel to consider (policy |
| 6 |
> violation or whatever). This is a categorization of the report, not an |
| 7 |
> argument why it is valid. (This could be handled by a predefined set of |
| 8 |
> reasons by an existing Bugzilla field similar to "Component," but |
| 9 |
> currently it is not.) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
An enumeration or list of examples would be rather helpful, here. Since |
| 12 |
you say it could be a predefined list, enumerating it in the RFC, or at |
| 13 |
least giving a couple examples, shouldn't be unreasonable. Keep in mind |
| 14 |
that it's possible/likely the filer will have never filed something like |
| 15 |
this before, so the vague guideline as stated simply isn't all that much |
| 16 |
help. You want it concrete, make it so. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Otherwise... unpleasant subject matter, but I'm glad someone's dealing |
| 19 |
with it. The rest seems reasonable enough. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 23 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 24 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 25 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives