1 |
On 06/08/11 11:43, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200 |
3 |
> Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
6 |
>> wrote: |
7 |
>>> In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible |
8 |
>>> and slow interface. So it does make sense to keep changelogs filled |
9 |
>>> with information - maybe automation is needed, I don't have a |
10 |
>>> strong opinion either way. But don't make me do more work because |
11 |
>>> you are lazy, that never ends well. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> IMO we should just make repoman commit update the ChangeLog. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> What if we wanted to remove ChangeLogs then for autogeneration? Will we |
16 |
> require all devs to quickly update their portage versions? |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Just make committing the ChangeLog fatal on the server side ;) |
20 |
|
21 |
There are enough ways to get it done ... |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org |
25 |
|
26 |
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist |
27 |
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds |