From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 | ||
Date: | Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:13:01 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120616160831.14497cc5@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 by Peter Stuge |
1 | On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:06:07 +0200 |
2 | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
3 | > Could it work to make automatic signatures of imported ABI, and |
4 | > simply compare signatures when a provider package is updated? |
5 | |
6 | No. |
7 | |
8 | Also, can we stop using the term "ABI" in reference to this please? |
9 | It's misleading. Let's call them sub-slots instead. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |