Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kim Nielsen <kn@××××××××××.dk>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: *****SPAM***** [gentoo-dev] (no subject)
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 02:52:30
Message-Id: 1024041151.6208.3.camel@knielsen
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] (no subject) by "Hing Lung Motor Mfy."
1 On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 10:40, Hing Lung Motor Mfy. wrote:
2 > SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
3 > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
4 > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
5 > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
6 > SPAM:
7 > SPAM: Content analysis details: (7.7 hits, 5 required)
8 > SPAM: Hit! (0.5 points) BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED
9 > SPAM: Hit! (0.6 points) BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED
10 > SPAM: Hit! (-1.5 points) BODY: 3 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED
11 > SPAM: Hit! (2.1 points) BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up
12 > SPAM: Hit! (0.0 points) BODY: Includes a URL link to send an email
13 > SPAM: Hit! (3.2 points) HTML-only mail, with no text version
14 > SPAM: Hit! (2.3 points) Date: Differs by more than 4 days from current date
15 > SPAM: Hit! (0.5 points) Received via a relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
16 > SPAM: [RBL check: found 110.70.130.202.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6]
17 > SPAM:
18 > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
19 >
20
21 Couldn't we add spamassin to the maillist ? spammers/relayers should not
22 be allow to post
23
24 Just an idea
25
26 /Kim

Replies

Subject Author
Re: *****SPAM***** [gentoo-dev] (no subject) Stuart Bouyer <stuart@××××××××××××××××.jp>