| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:34:05AM +0300, Sami N??t?nen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 13 June 2005 23:54, Sven Wegener wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:40:34PM -0500, Kito wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > what about just a use.env? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I find that a little bit misleading. Sounds like "use this |
| 7 |
> > environment" or so. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> How about use.lock, which would lock the listed use flags from normal |
| 10 |
> usage. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I already had the idea of using use.<whatever> and merge it with |
| 13 |
use.mask so that we have one file to force flags on or off for a |
| 14 |
profile. That means three operators, "force enable", "force disable" and |
| 15 |
"clear settings from parent profiles" but currently the parser works |
| 16 |
with just two operator, flag and -flag. So portage would need more |
| 17 |
changes here. But after reading the file portage would (assuming the |
| 18 |
current code base) split them in two categories, masked flags and forced |
| 19 |
flags, so it's easier IMHO to just keep them in two different files. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sven |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Sven Wegener |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 26 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
Archives