1 |
W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 22∶17 +0200, użytkownik Mart Raudsepp |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > # ARM64 Profiles |
5 |
> > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0 dev |
6 |
> > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0 exp |
7 |
> > arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop exp |
8 |
> > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop/systemd dev |
9 |
> > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop/systemd exp |
10 |
> > arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/developer exp |
11 |
> > arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/systemd exp |
12 |
> > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0 dev |
13 |
> > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0 exp |
14 |
> > arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/desktop exp |
15 |
> > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/desktop/systemd dev |
16 |
> > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/desktop/systemd exp |
17 |
> > arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/developer exp |
18 |
> > arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/systemd exp |
19 |
> |
20 |
> With this I'll need to run through all of these profiles with |
21 |
> repoman -e=y and wait a long time, instead of just the two (well, with |
22 |
> 17.0 now 4) profiles that I actually care about and checks enough. I |
23 |
> also will see a TON of issues from the musl profiles down below that |
24 |
> main block (it doesn't inherit base or something). |
25 |
> |
26 |
> This would make arm64 work completely impossible, so NAK from me. |
27 |
|
28 |
repoman has --include-arches option for a reason. Profile statuses are |
29 |
not your private convenience. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Additionally if depgraph wouldn't be broken anymore, we would be moving |
32 |
> them to stable, not some separate "dev" step. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Same goes for the mips main block changes. |
35 |
|
36 |
But it is broken, and it won't become less broken if we keep ignoring |
37 |
the fact and not reporting new breakages just because one developer |
38 |
can't fix his workflow. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Best regards, |
42 |
Michał Górny |