| 1 |
On Monday 27 October 2003 08:35 pm, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 06:21, Matt Chorman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 27 October 2003 08:09 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 01:46, Matt Chorman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > My experience with ntpl has been exaclty like this - even downgrading |
| 6 |
> > > > did not help. Try recompiling glibc WITHOUT use=ntpl. Your binaries |
| 7 |
> > > > will (should?) start to work again. Mine did.... |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > What CPU is in this box ? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > This is running an AthlonXP 2000+.. Ye Olde AMD chips... ;-) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> What gcc/binutils ? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I initially tried with gcc 3.3.1-r5, binutils 2.14.90.0.6-r6, glibc 2.3.2-r6. |
| 16 |
After seeing the thread on the stability of nptl this AM I decided to try |
| 17 |
re-emerging glibc with USE=nptl (famous last words). I sync'd and emerge'd |
| 18 |
glibc-2.3.2-r8 (with nptl). I dropped out of X and went to get back in when I |
| 19 |
started getting segfaults. I decided to bump gcc to 3.3.2-r1 and binutils to |
| 20 |
2.14.90.0.6-r7 (with the new glibc). I was still getting segfaults, so I |
| 21 |
emerged glibc with the new gcc/binutils and the segfaults were still there. |
| 22 |
Tried again by going back to glibc-2.3.2-r7 (with nptl) - no joy. I removed |
| 23 |
nptl from the use flags, re-emerged glibc-2.3.2-r8 and voila, everything is |
| 24 |
back to normal. In the process, I did try to recompile xfree but there was no |
| 25 |
change. I also use prelink - so somewhere during this process I ran a prelink |
| 26 |
-ua but still had segfaults. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Is there a bug open for this that I should be posting at? Need any more info? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Matt |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives