Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:14:09
Message-Id: 20140630181345.702381e2@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch by Ian Stakenvicius
1 On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:40:19 -0400
2 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > But... if I unmask it, -everyone- using ~arch will install it and
5 > it'll break all the systems that it doesn't work on, which -could- be
6 > quite a lot at this point. :D
7
8 Which is great, because then you have an actual test result, whereas
9 before you had nothing but a stupid mask.
10
11 And lots of people are suddenly very much interested in getting any and
12 all bugs fixed in the new ebuild, whereas before you only had the stupid
13 mask.
14
15
16 jer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>