1 |
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
3 |
>> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates |
4 |
>> for January. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the |
7 |
>> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to |
8 |
>> keep the stable tree more up-to-date. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and |
11 |
>> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions |
12 |
>> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I have an RSS feed for this purpose at: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Sources are available here: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo |
24 |
> infrastructure so more people know about it and use it? |
25 |
|
26 |
File a bug against us then, with all the information needed for the deployment |
27 |
|
28 |
Theo |