Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for the portage maintainers
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:36:24
Message-Id: 20040412234440.GB31124@phaenix.haell.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for the portage maintainers by Spider
1 On Mon, 2004-04-12, 23:26:06 +0200, in <20040412232606.51a010f7.spider@g.o>, Spider <spider@g.o> wrote:
2 > begin quote
3 > On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:17:30 +0100
4 > Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> wrote:
5 >
6 > > On Monday 12 April 2004 21:58, Marius Mauch wrote:
7 > > > On 04/12/04 Stuart Herbert wrote:
8 > > > > Will Portage function without /var/cache/edb?
9 > > >
10 > > > Yes, but it will be _very_ slow.
11 > > >
12 > > > Marius
13 > >
14 > > Then we shouldn't be putting this in /var/cache. It's for temporary
15 > > files, and can be emptied at any time without warning. This should
16 > > really go into /var/db.
17 >
18 >
19 > even worse. the "world" file, and the configs are also stored in
20 > /var/cache. "not good".
21
22 If I understand FHS correctly, the "cache" stuff should go somewhere
23 under /var/tmp. /var/cache/edb/{config,counter,mtimedb,virtuals,world}
24 and /var/db/pkg should go somewhere under /var/lib. FHS specifically
25 states that /var/db shouldn't even exist.
26
27 --
28 Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"?
29 Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
30 --Ghost in the Shell